User talk:47.189.52.193

March 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pat Boone, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''The part about an erroneous death reported by the CBS Morning News on March 14 needs a reliable source. Don't add unsourced, as this is contentious material.'' MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pat Boone. Upgrading the warning all the way to final with unsourced content also added at List of premature obituaries, including for Boone. MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pat Boone. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Unsourced content concerning biographies of living persons must be removed if contentious, and you continue to add the content without sourcing. Once more, and an edit-warring report will be filed.'' MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of premature obituaries. This is your absolute last warning regarding this string of false information, about news outlets erroneously reporting deaths of various people. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 11:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I have blocked you for returning to the same behavior that got you blocked the first time. If, after this block expires, you persist in continuing edits such as this, the next block will be considerably longer. Please STOP. --Hammersoft (talk) 11:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Helen Mirren have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 00:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Desi Arnaz. - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 22:26, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Eddie Rabbitt
You must provide a reliable source regarding Eddie Rabbitt being a longtime smoker. Otherwise, I have removed your contribution. Zredman (talk) 12:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)