User talk:47.190.47.120

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Datagod (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Efforts to impeach George W. Bush— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA 0808 talkcontribs 14:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

 * 47.190.47.120-81055964 Dr3037251 (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

RA 0808 talkcontribs 19:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 81055964 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr3037251 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm datagod. You reverted an edit of mine on Splatterhouse. My edit was a revert of an unknown user removing the words PC-ENGINE from the description. The reason you gave was strange and cryptic. Please state a clear reason why you would remove PC-ENGINE from the description. Datagod (talk) 06:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
datagod here again. Please stop removing information from Billy Mitchell's page. You seem to know an awful lot about him for an anonymous account. Your justification for removing an entire section is books and articles exist, yet you do not cite them. Please stop vandalising the page. Also, you might have more luck if you created an actual account. Datagod (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove entire sections of the Twin Galaxies page without first discussing why on the talk page. Your recent edits seem to orbit around Twin Galaxies and the US National Video Game Team, almost as if you were so close to both organizations that you either have an incredible amount of inside information or you are carrying some sort of grudge. Even if 18 people received gifts before somebody else that does not give them the right to start sabotaging articles. Datagod (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove photos from Splatterhouse page without discussing why. Your edits are not contributing to the value of the articles. Datagod (talk) 02:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

My edit history shows that I have a broad interest in proper historical information on a wide variety of topics. Please take a look at it yourself. Stop trying to claim personal issues where there are none.

I previous added in links to two of several media links that prove Mitchell was NOT the first to a split screen. You are choosing to ignore them and claim I have not shared them, yet I have.47.190.47.120 (talk) 21:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

If you have time to make public accusations against me, you have time to talk to me
IP user, I've tried to discuss our edits on the talk pages but you just seem to want to edit war and wont respond. You've recently even put my name into an edit comment accusing AirlinePete of being a sockpuppet of fine. Thats a totally inappropriate edit comment. Not only is it not true, if you believe it, why not report it, or better yet discuss it with me? I have no idea why this is becoming personal for you other than you seem to think I'm someone you have an ongoing feud with this. If you have the time to continually revert edits and make accusations about me it seems you should be able to find the time to talk with me for at least a moment. SnowflakeFury (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Splatterhouse. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page and establish a consensus for the change before restoring your preferred version. Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ChamithN  (talk)  22:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Scott & White Medical Center have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Presidency of George W. Bush. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Agent00x. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Agent00x (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 9/11 Commission Report, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Dylsss. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Keith Raniere—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dylsss(talk contribs) 19:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm ToadetteEdit. I noticed that you recently removed content from Baal Cycle without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toadette (let's chat together) 16:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)