User talk:47.196.135.17

December 2017
Hello, I'm Adotchar. I noticed that in this edit to Teachers College, Columbia University, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Adotchar &#124; reply here 11:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Teachers College, Columbia University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 12:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Teachers College, Columbia University, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Grey joy talk 16:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

See WP:UGC. "Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is also generally unacceptable. Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal blogs, group blogs, internet forums, the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), Ancestry.com, content farms, most wikis including Wikipedia, and other collaboratively created websites. In particular, a wikilink is not a reliable source."--Boldstandard (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

TC is part of the larger Columbia community, but is an affiliate. Go to columbia.edu and scroll to the bottom. TC is listed under "affiliate schools".--Boldstandard (talk) 01:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

First, please see WP:UGC and we can talk after that. A PERSONAL BLOG IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE PER WP:UGC. --Boldstandard (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Boldstandard (talk) 03:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Boldstandard (talk) 03:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Although you have not responded to my earlier posts, I would like to ask about the sources you use in the Teachers College article. In the edit summary of Teachers College and Columbia University, you have argued that a picture of a diploma which is uploaded to a personal blog "seems" to be legit, while the directory on Columbia.edu is not legit. Please explain.--Boldstandard (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 13:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Eggybonk11. An edit that you recently made to History of AT&T seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Timmy (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.