User talk:47.201.63.17

June 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ronna McDaniel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I did make a valid reason. All of the sources are from leftist sources. Cbs,Washington Post, NYT, Usa Today, and especially vox news which is highly partisan and shouldn't be allowed as a source on a wikipedia article. I however see no right wing sources why not include fox news? Oh right it is because the whole article is completely against the repuplican paty. I ask you to consider editing the article and making it a little less biased. Repuplicans also exist in wikipedia. 47.201.63.17 (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The sources are left-leaning, but that does not mean that they don't have a longstanding reputation of journalistic integrity. See WP:RSPVOX. If you can find another reliable source on that page which provides a strong counterclaim, please bring it up on the article's talk page so editors can collaborate on integrating it into the article. mooshberry -> talk ; 19:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Vox.com isn't just left leaning. It's a partisan news website. It's a very biased news organization. 47.201.63.17 (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Here is a quote from All Sides news bias. "The AllSides team found that Vox consistently writes favorably about left-leaning policies and never includes a Right-leaning perspective. Articles on Vox.com have tied President Trump to fascism, and its "Explainers" section almost never includes Right-leaning opinions or viewpoints. Vox's Explainers provide only one side of an issue, making it seem as if the information provided is all readers need to know, when in reality, Right-leaning individuals would likely include other facts or make different points about the topic. This prevents readers from getting a holistic understanding of the highlighted issues.
 * The AllSides team noted that Vox often frames news and issues as if the Left perspective is the only perspective, and its hard news articles include commentary that is subjective in nature. Vox often blurs the line between news and editorial. One AllSides team member noted Vox "seems like advocacy outlet for the Democratic Party, showing all the "news" you'd like to hear as a Democrat." 47.201.63.17 (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronna McDaniel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. mooshberry -> talk ; 19:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. RealLifeRobot (talk) 20:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Last warning
Final warning: stop your disruptive editing. Again, go read WP:YESPOV, WP:RSP, and go raise concerns on WP:NPOVN.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * "The AllSides team found that Vox consistently writes favorably about left-leaning policies and never includes a Right-leaning perspective. Articles on Vox.com have tied President Trump to fascism, and its "Explainers" section almost never includes Right-leaning opinions or viewpoints. Vox's Explainers provide only one side of an issue, making it seem as if the information provided is all readers need to know, when in reality, Right-leaning individuals would likely include other facts or make different points about the topic. This prevents readers from getting a holistic understanding of the highlighted issues.
 * The AllSides team noted that Vox often frames news and issues as if the Left perspective is the only perspective, and its hard news articles include commentary that is subjective in nature. Vox often blurs the line between news and editorial. One AllSides team member noted Vox "seems like advocacy outlet for the Democratic Party, showing all the "news" you'd like to hear as a Democrat." 47.201.63.17 (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Vox is not the primary source for those claims. It was a CBS investigation so please stop blanking the article on the basis that vox is left leaning.
 * Left leaning does not mean the article contains false statements or claims.
 * As I mentioned, if you can find another news source with reliable consensus on Wikipedia which counters these claims, you are absolutely welcome to bring it up on the talk page so editors can decide how to include it. mooshberry -> talk ; 20:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)