User talk:47.219.243.154

April 2024
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kevin MacDonald (evolutionary psychologist) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please take your issues to the talk page of the article. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm sorry that you misunderstood, however, did explain my changes. Allow me to elaborate. I removed the overly negative bias in the introduction paragraph. All of the information I removed is still available in the appropriate sections of the entry. When the opening paragraph is so obviously negative, as it was prior to my edit, it tends to undermine the integrity and reputation of the platform. An unbiased source of information is far more valuable to society than the current state of Wikipedia. I know of no college professor, or even grade school teacher, which would allow Wikipedia to be used as a reference. The overwhelming reason is the unreliability of the information, both from the open ability to edit, but also the bias placed on many of the entries. 47.219.243.154 (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)