User talk:47.226.86.99

October 2020
Hello, I'm AntiCompositeNumber. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 1995–96 Chicago Bulls season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 1995–96 Chicago Bulls season, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2016–17 Golden State Warriors season seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EN-Jungwon (talk) 08:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2015–16 Golden State Warriors season. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''It's already mentioned they broke records. If further commentary is still necessary, please reliably source it.'' —Bagumba (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Joe Montana, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your edits in various article about being "regarded as one of the greatest players" is being reverted by others. Such wording is generally avoided when it can instead be WP:SUBSTANTIATED that they were inducted into their sport's hall of fame. Please avoid such edits without establishing a consensus for them.'' —Bagumba (talk) 15:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as done at 2000–01 Los Angeles Lakers season. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2021
Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Iron Sheik, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SunDawn. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hakeem Olajuwon seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 03:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as done at Hakeem Olajuwon. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Super Bowl XLIII, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 19:40, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Derrick Henry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ashley yoursmile!  04:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to John Tyler, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DrPepperG (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I noticed that you recently removed content from Justin Tucker without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zim Zala Bim talk 23:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kenta Kobashi seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time  09:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't think this edit - "He has been consistently ranked both by scholars and the public as the greatest president in American history, often as number one." makes any sense. If he's consistently ranked the greatest then surely that's also number one, but "often" implies that it isn't consistent. As all the contributions from this IP address to the Lincoln, Johnson, Buchanan, and Fillmore pages have been reverted, it looks like it would be better to explain what you want on the relevant talk pages. Ttwaring (talk) 14:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * These are Lincoln's rankings: "01,01,01,01,03,02,02,01,01,01,02,02,02,01,01,03,02,01,02,01,01,03,01". The current statement "Alongside George Washington and Franklin D. Roosevelt, he has been consistently ranked both by scholars and the public as one of the top three greatest presidents, often as number one." sums this up very well, and you should not replace it with a less accurate version. Ttwaring (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi 47.226.86.99! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Presidency of Abraham Lincoln several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. ''Your edits are becoming disruptive. They have been reverted numerous times and comments left here. Please post on the talk page of that article for why you think your wording should be adopted.''. Zim Zala Bim talk 20:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Presidency of Abraham Lincoln. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 14:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, you may be blocked from editing. Ttwaring (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zim Zala Bim talk 17:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hi 47.226.86.99! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of James Buchanan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:James Buchanan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please refrain from edit warring at James Buchanan Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stone Cold Steve Austin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk </i> 01:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stone Cold Steve Austin. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 05:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
I reverted this edit of yours on Presidency of Abraham Lincoln: "Lincoln is consistently ranked in the top three greatest presidents, usually as number as the greatest president of the American history" as it is confusing. Also I reverted your edits to the Buchanan and Johnson articles. The previous wording was careful to note that each of them had often been rated the worst president. Your wording seemed to imply that both of them were always rated as the worst president. As you have just come back from a six month block for edit warring, and all your edits to US President articles were reverted in January and February, you should probably be careful in making any further changes. Ttwaring (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LichF. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LichF (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to James Buchanan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 04:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)