User talk:47.229.100.152

August 2021
Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to USS Enterprise (CVN-80) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at USS Arizona (BB-39). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -  wolf  06:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at USS Enterprise (CV-6), you may be blocked from editing. -  wolf  06:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Jurassic Park III. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Dates
Please stop changing dates on naval ship articles. They, and many military-related articles, use the Day-Month-Year (dmy) format. On the pages you changed, there was already a template at the top of the page (in the edit window) to advise editors of this. Going forward, if all the dates on a particular page are the same format, there is usually a reason for that, and before changing them all, I would suggest you ask on the article talk page, or the related WikiProject talk page. Thank you -  wolf  06:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Jamaica—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Cinnamon, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please do not change existing date formats. BilCat (talk) 07:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * no I’ll do what works for me because
 * I’m an American 47.229.100.152 (talk) 19:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)