User talk:47.230.152.9

December 2023
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Disney logo. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   WC  Quidditch ''' ☎   ✎  00:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disney logo. We already explained our reverts. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Walt Disney Pictures. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –  64andtim  ( talk ) 00:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Walt Disney Pictures, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2024
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to File:PBS (1984-2019) logo.svg—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 00:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at PBS, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --¨¨¨¨ Fama Clamosa (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --¨¨¨¨

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

The PBS logo on PBS article infobox is free.
MrSchimpf, please revert to non-free PBS logo on PBS article infobox because Fama Clamosa reverted the infobox to free file that's about to be deleted. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)


 * How about Materialscientist revert the PBS infobox to non-free PBS logo? 47.230.152.9 (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No, Achim55 will revert the PBS infobox image to non-free PBS logo. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Nope, Wcquidditch will revert the PBS infobox image to non-free PBS logo. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)