User talk:47.247.218.103

July 2022
Your recent editing history at A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
You saying a source is reliable does not make it so. The writer in question is known for "spiritual books" and prophesies belong on the webpage of the organisation, not an encyclopedia. Please do not add it again. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 10:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * the writer is knows as a scholar and is used by editors like dasanudasa in pages such as buddha in hinduism .prease do not engage in edit war 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Have a look at his "bibliography". If you think that is a reliable source on anything, we may have a competence issue. Kleuske (talk) 11:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 'the writer, author, philosopher, spiritual practitioner, traveler, photographer, and lecturer Stephen Knapp.'
 * this is what is written,what else you need? 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * helped attract members, and helped develop its direction and means of sharing the universal Vedic Dharma with students who were interested, and to connect with other scholars, writers, and lecturers who were involved and already working to help spread the profound nature of the Vedic knowledge
 * see 'other scholars' he is regarded as a scholar here in various pages again see buddha in hinduism 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * What a coincidence! I am a writer, author, philosopher, spiritual practitioner, traveler, photographer, too. And so is my dog! See how anybody can say that? See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Kleuske (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * your dog died, dog cannot be a 'the writer, author, philosopher, spiritual practitioner, traveler, photographer, and lecturer Stephen Knapp.'
 * you can talk to user dasanudasa 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * if you are such a scholar how many books you have written and what about spirituality you know? 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You fail to grasp the point made. Ok. So we do have a competence issue. I don't want to talk to dasanudasa (whoever that is) I want you to understand what a reliable source is. Kleuske (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * no such page exists 47.247.218.103 (talk) 11:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * A typo. Now resolved. But I see (WP:DUCK) you have now resumed edit-warring under an IPv6 address. I strongly suggest you self-revert that. 12:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism) for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)