User talk:47.25.168.240

May 2024
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Self-defense—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 01:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Self-defense. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 01:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Your edits appear to be vandalism and removal of peoples edits under the 1st amendment is a violation of 1st amendment right! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The 1st amendment does not apply here. Wikipedia is a private website.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 02:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Self-defense, you may be blocked from editing.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 01:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please, STOP removing peoples edits. It's constructive and a legitimate system in Self-Defense. You need to check your sources before removing something and quit being rude! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 02:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This is a legitimate Self-Defense system and I'm not being distruptive! Perhaps try checking the sources before removing a system from the self-defense page. With all due respect you're not being fair, considerate, or equal. This is a public forum. 47.25.168.240 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your problem is, your link leads to no article. You also need a source. It is on you to provide sources to support your argument. Also, please read WP:FREESPEECH.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 02:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It is a violation of Free Speech and 1st Amendment rights to remove someone's info on a PUBLIC site!! Wikipedia is filled with untrue, and unsourced information. There's many items on wikipedia including your bogus Self-Defense page that has no sourced information or links. Most of the information on your page is not true and inaccurate. Check your sources on your own "Self-Defense" page as it's filled with inaccuracies and no articles. There's also no links, sources, or details on how to link or source a link! That's on you! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "What Wikipedia is not
 * Wikipedia is dedicated to expanding access to the sum of human knowledge. Wikipedia is not censored, but it does not provide a platform for all forms of human expression. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an anarchy or a personal blog or web host." - off the link you provided.
 * - So in other words, yes, Wikipedia is censored, and does not allow for human expression. 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "provide sources to support your argument."
 * - Self-Defense wikipedia page was/not up for debate or argument, it's supposed to be an informative page, not debate page, so I thought. 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "Your problem is, your link leads to no article."
 * Respectfully, neither does 99% of the listings on the page! And it's not MY problem, it's you problem, with all due respect, it's never been an issue before now/today. This is your issue, I'm expressing views you don't like or agree with, that's on you, not me. Respectfully. 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Self-defense.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 03:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * And with all due respect, the Self-Defense page is filled with unsourced, unverified information. I found at least a dozen untrue information on the page itself. You talk about unsourced? Also, per Wikipedia rules, you have to give substantial notice and warning before blocking someone. Blocking someone after 1 warning is not substantial! So your going against your own rules. Then you wonder why so many people no longer contribute, edit, or read Wikipedia, as your editors and administrators with your bias, racist, and prejudice rules, make it impossible for people to contribute! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, disruptive edits means it has to actually be disruptive, not opinion. I'm adding a system to the list, and you don't like it and so removing it in itself is disruptive. Contradictory! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Once my 24 hour suspension is up, I will no longer edit, post, or view Wikipedia! In my personal opinion, I think you are racist, bias, prejudice, and on a power trip. I'm not going to appeal this, seeing how it's only 24 hours. But I think the rules do not apply to everyone, and only a certain group. I do not want my information on a page that is bias, prejudice, and promotes only 1 sided viewpoints. In my personal opinion I do not believe you are an effective editor, as you've demonstrated. I believe this is a perfect example of how you Wikipedia editors are bias and only allow information you agree with, not information from all sides. You wonder why so many people have stopped editing, contributing, and reading Wikipedia? Your the answer! Calling me a distruptive editor? With all due respect, you're the one whose disrupting and causing a huge unnecessary turmoil which did not have to be. Wikipedia does not make it easy to cite sources or links, which again is on you. I take no responsibility for this, as I did nothing wrong, except share my opinion on something that is really inaccurate and incorrect to begin with. Shame on you sir! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I gave you 4 warnings, but alright then.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 05:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Respectfully, no sir you did not! 47.25.168.240 (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)