User talk:47.32.9.63

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to Andamanese peoples&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me  • contribs) 20:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brontë family, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fieryninja (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Zips—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Timothy Dalton. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wrigley Field—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 22:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Excellent copyediting on Harem
I'd never looked at the Harem article before all your copyediting activity. Who'd have thought an article on such a well known thing would be filled with so many, um... opportunities for improvement. Your dedication is appreciated. Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt you. Carry on. signed, Willondon (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Luke10.27. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Linda Darnell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Luke10.27 (talk) 05:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello! I'm Renewal6. Your recent edit(s) to the page Good Friday Agreement appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Circe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 00:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, It was absolutely not my intention to subvert your article with "unconstructive" edits. 47.32.9.63 (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Could you please give me an example of one of my "unconstructive edits?" Oh, you reverted it to the previous version, so you can't do that. 47.32.9.63 (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * How about ?  signed, Willondon (talk)  21:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It may not be your intention to be unconstructive, but no one can tell because you consistently neglect to leave an WP:EDITSUMMARY. However, you are definitely engaging in an WP:EDITWAR with other editors who find your changes to Circe unacceptable. Some of those have been outright WP:vandalism, others have been to wording which are not only unhelpful but make the meaning less clear. You have now been warned that the pattern of your behaviour over the past two years is disrupting Wikipedia - and of the consequences if you continue to do so. It would be a good idea for you to look at the editorial guidelines and follow them. If you, or whoever else edits from this anonymous account, continue in the same way, the administrators will be advised to block you from further editing. Sweetpool50 (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.