User talk:47.37.96.144

June 2018
Hello, I'm Broadwaygenius. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Broadwaygenius  (talk)  15:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philip Michael. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Philip Michael was changed by 47.37.96.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851341 on 2018-09-10T06:50:50+00:00

October 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Radford family, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 05:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 19 Kids and Counting. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 19 Kids and Counting was changed by 47.37.96.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862556 on 2018-10-02T05:15:14+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Promethean. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Counting On— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Promethean  (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)