User talk:478jjjz

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlanta Union Mission
A tag has been placed on Atlanta Union Mission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RENNS


The article RENNS has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Re-adding PROD. Appears to be a non-notable mnemonic found in a writing guidebook by Lynn Quitman Troyka, does not have independent sourcing or other significance.  Not appropriate subject matter for an encyclopedic article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 07:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Negative patient care outcome listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Negative patient care outcome. Since you had some involvement with the Negative patient care outcome redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Combat emplacement evacuator listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Combat emplacement evacuator. Since you had some involvement with the Combat emplacement evacuator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of PAVPANIC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PAVPANIC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PAVPANIC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Uanfala (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Professor Obama listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Professor Obama. Since you had some involvement with the Professor Obama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Goveganplease (talk) 13:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Islamic state
Template:Islamic state has been nominated for merging with Template:Islam topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of On a white bus


The article On a white bus has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable mnemonic device; BEFORE search only brought up Wikipedia mirrors and teaching posters."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why? I Ask (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

"Portable hand-held communications inscriber" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Portable hand-held communications inscriber and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

"Meditation room" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Meditation room and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

"Fenestration engineer" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fenestration engineer and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

"Environmental superintendent" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Environmental superintendent and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)