User talk:49.0.12.206

July 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to solder, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Alcohol (horse) has been reverted. Your edit here to Alcohol (horse) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/AlcoholTheHorse) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2015
Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Horse (zodiac)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 22:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=682435499 your edit] to Internet Assigned Numbers Authority may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * * In 2015, Anirudh Rajput ( Engineer)
 * Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance (GMMFIG) conference, 23–24 April 2014.

September 2016
Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gene Hackman— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 12:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Steve Harwell— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Steve Harwell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Adding false information
Hello! I would like to politely request that you please refrain from deliberately adding false information to Wikipedia. Here at Wikipedia, we do everything we possibly can to be as reliable as possible. Having people intentionally add false information only makes our job even harder than it already is. Even if you are adding the information because you are trying to prove a point or make a case, it still just makes things harder for all of us and does not really help anyone.

If you are wondering how long your edit was online, I must inform you that it was live for precisely three minutes before I reverted it. Usually, such edits are reverted immediately, either by a bot or by a responsible editor such as myself. It is relatively rare for such edits to remain online for more than five minutes. --Katolophyromai (talk) 02:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mandarin Chinese— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Putesky. scope_creep (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm Alpha3031. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to White-tailed spider— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; Alpha3031 (talk &#124; contribs) 03:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Diljit Dosanjh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.