User talk:49.145.224.244

August 2016
Hello, I'm RunnyAmiga. I noticed that you recently removed some content from CamelCase without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RunnyAmiga (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to CamelCase, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Snowycats (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to CamelCase, you may be blocked from editing. — MRD2014 ( talk ) ( contribs ) 00:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bactrian camel. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)