User talk:49.146.10.123

June 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1992. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See Talk:1992. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The guidelines for determining which images are added are problematic. There used to be guidelines for determining who is to be included in births and deaths, but we were bullied into removing them.  I don't see why Logan Lerman is that notable, but, as we've both probably violated WP:3RR, as well as WP:EW on 1992, I ask you to self-revert your last change, and we can discuss the matter on Talk:1992.  The only real requirements at this point is:
 * Images in births and deaths must correspond to entries.
 * Images are in chronological order of birth or death.
 * Images are 120px wide, and doubleimage is not used.
 * Images must not overflow the month (or year, for birth categories in recent years which have not been separated into months) section. When editing, you may notice that some entries are commented out.  In theory, those should only be in recent years where we should expect more entries, which will allow room for more images.
 * — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * My personal feeling is that an entertainer who has only one significant role, such as professional wrestlers, should not have an image. (Yes, professional wrestling is entertainment, not sport.)  I don't have general consensus for that, but it has been supported in most cases where I've brought it up.  I don't know where Logan Lerman fits in that.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid the page has been temporarily protected (not by me) because of edit warring. Please discuss at Talk:1992, whether or not in the section indicated above, and we may come to a satisfactory agreement. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)