User talk:49.177.192.172

May 2020
Hello, I'm Slazenger. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Convicts in Australia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 04:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Convicts in Australia. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Convicts in Australia was changed by 49.177.192.172 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973853 on 2020-05-12T04:31:05+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Convicts in Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 04:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Stir frying, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)