User talk:49.178.1.94

Da Vinci Code
Please go to the Talk:The Da Vinci Code to propose your changes. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Possible edit-warring on The Da Vinci Code
Your recent editing history at The Da Vinci Code shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Every other editor who has reverted you has given you a chance to go to the talk page of the article, explain why you want to delete the article, and gain consensus, yet you repeatedly keep reverting to your favored version, which is the completely blank page. As I'm not really convinced at all that you're a copyright holder of the Code and assuming you're pretending to be one, using copyright as an excuse for blanking, your edits will be considered vandalism and had to be reverted. You have been blocked by an administrator for this reason, alongside making legal threats in your edit summaries. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (contiuned on User talk:49.178.41.82)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to The Da Vinci Code, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Da Vinci Code, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to The Da Vinci Code. Adam9007 (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

I am not a lawyer, but
 * 1) You have shown no proof that you are the copyright holder.
 * 2) Even if you are, simply talking about a copyrighted material does not constitute a violation of copyright. Wikipedia needs no permission from the copyright holder to discuss copyrighted material. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 01:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)