User talk:49.178.41.82

Possible edit-warring on The Da Vinci Code
Your recent editing history at The Da Vinci Code shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Every other editor who has reverted you has given you a chance to go to the talk page of the article, explain why you want to delete the article, and gain consensus, yet you repeatedly keep reverting to your favored version, which is the completely blank page. As I'm not really convinced at all that you're a copyright holder of the Code and assuming you're pretending to be one, using copyright as an excuse for blanking, your edits will be considered vandalism and had to be reverted. You have been blocked by an administrator for this reason, alongside making legal threats in your edit summaries. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You've evaded your block from your old IP and continued to revert on your new IP, which are now blocked. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to The Da Vinci Code, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 02:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Da Vinci Code has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Da Vinci Code was changed by 49.178.41.82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924085 on 2017-10-18T02:10:58+00:00.

October 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)