User talk:49.180.186.21

May 2024
Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eshay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You have made a mistake, since I lived and breathed most of my life in Western Sydney and have numerous accounts using the word. All previous sources noted and referenced is only been misleading by the generation who never knew where it started. And for the news using this word. They wouldn’t even know the meaning of it. As they would be told by the wrong generation what the so called meaning of the word is currently being used for. 49.180.186.21 (talk) 08:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * We need more than your word here; we need a published reliable source that can be verified. If you have one, see Referencing for beginners to learn how to properly add it. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * How can you go off the meaning that the news articles use when they have no reference to where the word came from? This whole meaning should be voided! 49.180.186.21 (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The article as it is now has several sources. If you are saying that these do not document the use and meaning of this term as claimed in the article, please discuss this on the article talk page, detailing the errors. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I question all these several sources as they a published news articles claiming ‘Eshays’ are type of people. Which was never the intention for the meaning of this word. I also question where you are from? Are you even from Australia? And Sydney? 49.180.186.21 (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Where I am from is not relevant. Anyone from anywhere in the world who can understand English is free to contribute about any topic that they wish, because articles here should summarize what independent reliable sources that are publicly available say about the topic. Articles are not based on personal knowledge or other unverifiable information. If you have sources for what you claim is the intention of the term, please offer them. If not, then we must go by the sources that are available and provided. I'm not saying you are wrong- you may be correct- but you need sources to support it. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You should contact Spanian from YouTube. He will backup my reference to the word. I’m sure he will change the thought of how evrything referenced in the article here is incorrectly referenced. 49.180.186.21 (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Information must be in a published reliable source that can be verified. If you just want to tell the world your or anyone else's personal view as to what this term means or is used for, that is what social media is for. YouTube is not considered a reliable source as anyone can post anything on YouTube without fact checking, editorial control, and other journalistic standards. One exception is news organizations or similar with a verified channel. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)