User talk:49.183.8.246

July 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Spirit of the Game, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spirit of the Game. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Spirit of the Game Contributions
I'd just like to let you know that your edits to Spirit of the Game are irrelevant to the subject of the article. While the director does have a connection, your contributions don't meaningfully contribute to the article. Furthermore, you did not source these contributions. See WP:RS for info about how to source claims properly. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Agreed. I reverted another round of the same. Even should it be true (I haven't checked because it's irrelevant to the matter at hand), it's a digression in that context, and Wikipedia articles aren't to be used to serve the purpose you appeared to have in mind. Largoplazo (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)