User talk:49.193.0.169

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lois Chiles, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Maxim Masiutin Hi Maxim. I'm a little confused. The edit I made to this article was a grammatical correction, and you have now reverted the article back to the grammatically incorrect version. The sentence as it now appears does not make sense, especially when one refers back to the cited article from which the information in the sentence was taken. Could you please explain your reasoning for removing my correction? 49.193.0.169 (talk) 13:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for raising this issue. I explained my motivation in the article's talk page, i.e. Talk:Lois_Chiles. Can you please reply in the article's talk page at Talk:Lois_Chiles so that the other editors could also express their opinion on substance, should there be such a need? Maxim Masiutin (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Maxim Masiutin Thanks, but I would rather not post on the talk page. The sentence in question is not a comparative, and the first "as" is not needed. Read the cited article from which the information is taken. She is not saying that being asked to say "Oh, James" is as annoying as not being able to live up to fantasies. She is saying that being asked by people to say "Oh, James" is annoying because her delivery of the line cannot live up to fantasies. I've corrected the grammar of this line once again to something slightly different as it seems the "as" issue was confusing you a little. I hope this resolves things and that you are able to parse the rewritten sentence. 49.193.0.169 (talk) 20:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Please make sure to write good edit summaries in the future to prevent eventual rollbacks. Also, I'm sorry that you were reluctant to discuss in the article Talk page, because other editors will see my arguments but not yours, and may rollback your edit. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Maxim Masiutin Thanks, Maxim! I don't have any plans to continue to contribute to Wikipedia regularly into the future, but if I change my mind, I'll follow your advice about providing edit summaries. 49.193.0.169 (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)