User talk:49.195.103.221

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (49.195.103.221) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Ost (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Your recent editing history at Criticism of Sikhism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 07:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Alternate accounts
Do you have any relationship with 58.106.228.204 or User:Mawlidman? Editing without logging in is okay in wikipedia, editing the same article and restoring/edit warring the same content using alternate accounts isn't (See why). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring and violating WP:3RR at Criticism of Sikhism. I am also concerned about your use of sources (snippets from Google books are indeed dangerous to use, as are newspapers, for an academic subject), as discussed at Talk:Criticism of Sikhism. Also the way you impugn the motives of your opponent ("Your edits and comments imply you are personally invested in minimising the criticism of sikhism", etc). Please see WP:AGF. You may end up topic banned from Sikhism unless you improve your practice. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC).