User talk:49.195.129.208

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (49.195.129.208) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Longhair\talk 06:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Some policies for you to read
You edit to Australian Greens was unsourced. I also have my doubts about other similar edits you have made recently. Please have a look at WP:RS and WP:EDITWARRING. Such changes also should be addressed on the article Talk pages before you make them. HiLo48 (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Your recent editing history at Australian Greens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Longhair\talk 07:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Longhair\talk 07:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock
This editor has evaded this existing block by making the same disruptive edits without consensus at -- Longhair\talk 08:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Where is the proof? Yeah that's what I thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Allow me to just add that I blocked you for your inability to discuss edits deemed controversial by others at talk pages, and then pushing your barrow at my own talk page, reverting my own rollback removing your comment which was nothing to do with the issue I'd warned you about (edit warring). Another administrator will review your unblock request in due course. -- Longhair\talk 08:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Just delete this whole thing page because there's no point even trying any more. Consistency is dead. Freedom of speech is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Another administrator can deal with you from this point onwards. Again, I made zero comment about your edits, but your edit warring and disruption was my concern. -- Longhair\talk 08:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * This editor also took his article content argument to my Talk page, AFTER I had earlier told him to use the Article's Talk page. - User talk:HiLo48. HiLo48 (talk) 08:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * If you want to change it then I'm taking it up with you. Plus the talk page already contained the consensus I required for the change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Read this:
 * ǝsɹnoɔ s,ʇᴉ ǝʞɐʇ sƃuᴉɥʇ ʇǝl ʇsnſ ˙ʇᴉ ǝʞᴉl ʇ,uop sɹǝɥʇo ǝsnɐɔǝq ʇsnɾ sʇᴉpǝ ƃuᴉʞɐɯ ɯoɹɟ ǝɯ doʇs oʇ ʎɹʇ ʇ,uop ˙ʎɹʇ ʇ,uop os lɐɹʇnǝu sᴉ ǝuo oN ˙ɟo ʇno ʎɐʇS ˙ǝpᴉɔǝp ǝldoǝd ǝɥʇ ʇǝl ʇsnſ ¿ǝƃɹɐɥɔuᴉ noʎ ʇnd oɥM ¿ɹoʇɐᴉpǝɯ ʎɐld noʎ plnoɥs ʎɥM ˙plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɥʇᴉʍ ƃuoɹʍ s,ʇɐɥʍ sᴉ sᴉɥ┴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Which translates in undisruptive text to... "This is what's wrong with the world. Why should you play mediator? Who put you in charge? Just let the people decide. Stay out of. No one is neutral so don't try to stop me from making edits just because others don't like it. Just let things take it's course" . With this attitude at Wikipedia, you can expect this block to be your first of many... just saying. Seen it all before and it's never ended any differently. -- Longhair\talk 10:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

You have no reply because you know I'm right. I had to write it that way because Wikipedia blocks freedom of speech. By the way, who cares if a comment is unsigned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Almost everyone cares, because it helps to know who wrote something. If I didn't sign this, it would look like a continuation of your comment. Not ideal. HiLo48 (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As things are now, it looks like I wrote your comment. HiLo48 (talk) 10:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * (ec) Free speech is not relevant on this privately operated website. Just as you can tell people what they can and cannot say in your own home, Wikipedia can tell you what you can and cannot say here.  Free speech only means that the government cannot put you in jail or punish you for your speech. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Don't feed the troll any longer folks. Signing posts is common courtesy and how things are done here. Goodbye. -- Longhair\talk 10:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * This is my page. If Wikipedia doesn't like then they can delete it. If you're so powerful then do that then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * The problem is not what you did, but how you went about it. You can't just make a change like you did based on your own opinion, without supporting independent reliable sources. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent sources state, not in our opinions. When challenged, you are supposed to bring the discussion to the article talk page, not simply engage in edit warring because you think you are right. It is up to you to demonstrate that you are right and achieve consensus. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I did not bring my opinion into this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Australia
 * That link clearly shows my proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.129.208 (talk • contribs)


 * Interesting find. This is where we draw on the policy WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because another article says something doesn't make it right. Everything here is created by the same collaborative process. Now you have brought that article to my attention, I intend to challenge the absence of sourcing for the table near the beginning. It's a poor example of the craft of good editing. HiLo48 (talk) 10:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As Wikipedia is not a reliable source, you can't use it to support other Wikipedia changes. As I stated, you need independent reliable sources.  You need to start signing your posts.  You won't be asked again. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * So if Wikipedia is unreliable then why does it still exist and why are you supporting it? 49.195.129.208 (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Longhair\talk 11:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.