User talk:49.195.183.131

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Simla Convention. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * And what are you doing? none of my edits are false or made in bad faith. None are not even denied by any scholar yet you are reverting my edits yourself. You however claimed the convention "was made into effect" despite that is pov pushing without any consensus and even contradicted by British laws. You are the one who deletes Neville Maxwell report and I am the one to undelete it and explain why it's highly relevant to the topic and factual. But let's take this to talk page and discuss. That is the only thing I do agree with you there :) 49.195.183.131 (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

 * Please use the talk page of the article to discuss the issues and obtain WP:CONSENSUS. If you continue to edit-war, you are liable to be sanctioned. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Even your notice is not really applicable here. This article is about Tibet and the British government and china. Maybe the sanction applies but that would be really really far fetched considering that sanction was actually created because Indian nationalists and Pakistan nationalists kept arguing bitterly over Kashmir and other more modern issues. This topic is way outside of that area both in time and geography. But nonetheless, I am not here to cause trouble but disagree with info that is not true such as claiming that Simla convention was legitimately "made into effect" despite even the British government rejected it on day one. You yourself was pushing a pov there, that is even contradicted by the official British gov narrative who have always claimed consistently that china had suzerainty over tibet and hence cany contracts without chinese signatures, would not be constitutional according to British own foreign policy laws. Since surzeinty means that they need chinese gov permission for any contracts or dealings with tibet. And I am willing to properly discuss on talk page and even allow 72 hours of zero response before making edits again. So I am hardly even breaking this sanction EVEN if it actually applies to me which I am pretty sure it most likely doesn't.49.195.183.131 (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of registered account

 * I am the user 49.195.183.131. as of 28/10/2020. I registered an account today - (nvtuil) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nvtuil. I will be editing from that username in the future. 49.195.183.131 (talk) 03:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)