User talk:49.195.39.151

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2014 Sydney hostage crisis ‎. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

2014 Sydney hostage crisis
Please stop changing the title in the infobox and the article lead. Wikipedia's Manual of Style calls for these to match the title of the article, which will not be changed without consensus being established on the article's Talk page. If you continue to persistently change this information against consensus, you may be blocked from editing.  Dwpaul  Talk   07:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2014 Sydney hostage crisis. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.  Dwpaul  Talk   07:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 Sydney hostage crisis.  Dwpaul  Talk   07:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zheng Pengfei, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 04:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zheng Pengfei, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 05:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Did you look at my edit? I added a Reuters Source. I do believe you made a mistake. The page is already showing the medal tally with a silver for the Olympics. It was a Good Faith edit and if you think he didn't win a silver. Why only revert my edit and not the medal tally? Regardless I have now added two sources so don't say I never added any. 49.195.39.151 (talk) 05:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rdp060707&#124;talk 06:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Maybe you can wait just over 50 seconds before reverting. I was going to put in a source but there is an UNUSUAL fast revertion of my edit of approx 15 seconds. If you actually wait 51 seconds, I would have put in the source but wasn't able to as you reverted before I even reloaded the page. How are you so quick? Not even a full minute had passed 🙄and I wasn't expecting such fast responses in literally less than a minute. But I have zero intention of doing any bad Faith edits. My last edit to that Article was NOT IN BAD FAITH and I re-added back the info plus sources, so cut me some slack. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1036877223 49.195.39.151 (talk) 08:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)