User talk:49.2.72.181

November 2021
Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anthony Seibold, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anthony Seibold. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 12:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anthony Seibold have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anthony Seibold was changed by 49.2.72.181 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873602 on 2021-12-03T10:46:23+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Seibold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anthony Seibold—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 15:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Anthony Seibold, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —  B203GTB   •  (talk)  • 13:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Seibold. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —  B203GTB   •  (talk)  • 13:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

April 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Milton Dick have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Milton Dick was changed by 49.2.72.181 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874417 on 2022-04-21T09:13:15+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Milton Dick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (talk &#8226; contribs) 12:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jim Chalmers, you may be blocked from editing. PAVLOV (talk) 12:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. KH-1 (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2022
Hello, I'm Such-change47. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anthony Seibold—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. MaxnaCarter (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Seibold. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UndeadAnarchy (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Seibold, you may be blocked from editing. David Brooks (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Payne Haas. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jayant Patel, you may be blocked from editing. Zudo (talk • contribs) 12:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jayant Patel—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 09:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andrew Voss. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 09:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jayant Patel, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 09:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Jayant Patel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adakiko (talk) 09:53, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Jayant Patel. Adakiko (talk) 07:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. firefly ( t · c ) 10:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anthony Seibold—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anthony Seibold. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Jprg1966. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Angus Innes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jprg1966 (talk)  14:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Danny Weidler—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)