User talk:49.204.182.237

June 2021
Hello, I'm Meticulo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Daphne du Maurier without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  How was content 'disproved', as you say in your edit summary? Meticulo (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daphne du Maurier, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Daphne du Maurier. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruptive removal of material. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 12:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.