User talk:49.206.122.168

December 2018
Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Varalaru have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --David Tornheim (talk) 04:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * in particular this edit --David Tornheim (talk) 05:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thuppakki Munai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * in particular this edit --David Tornheim (talk) 05:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arrambam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * in particular this edit --David Tornheim (talk) 05:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dhoom 3, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 06:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits, like your unsourced change here where the DOB you submitted doesn't match the existing source. This is indistinguishable from vandalism. This is obviously vandalism as is this. Here you obnoxiously inflate a film's genre, as well as make unsustantiated claims about the film's critical response and adding other absurd commentary. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)