User talk:49.207.202.139

Help me!
Please help me with... Please explain how stating papers published in Science Journal and the Smithsonian Mag violates NOPV and the statement that is upheld today "Scholars have rejected his theories on these topics in entirety, and his writings have been heavily criticized." is compliant with policy?

I have provided sources citing that the "THEORY" stated is in question. I did not remove the previous statement. Why are newer evidences being rejected? Please explain in detail and cite all the sources in contention. Tapanchaudhary (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not clear from the question what article or sources you are referring to. Please link to the article in question. The sources can only be evaluated in the context of the statement that you are trying to support. If you have concerns about a specific article, it may be better to raise a conversation on the article's TALK page. That will allow other interested editors to offer a contrasting perspective and review the sources you wish to include. --Salimfadhley (talk) 12:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)