User talk:49TL/Archive-22

Information This is the FireFox talk page archive 22.

If you want to leave me a message, please see my current talk page.

Thanks
For both removing and readding my name! ε γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  18:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Blocks
Thanks for the note. I think I've figured out what I was doing wrong; I was putting the username in the User box at the block log, which doesn't show anything (versus the Title box). Crazy stuff, eh? Anyway, thanks again for setting me straight (and for not being too harsh about it). Happy edits! Deltabeignet 20:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

SORRY QUESTION!!!!!!!!
I HAVE QUESTION!!!! IF WIKI IS IN THE NOW THEN WHAT WHEN IF NEVER?? I MEAN ARE WE IN THE ARTICLE OF THE EDIT OR DO WE JUST TAKE A TROUBLE IN??? I DON'T GET THE SCREEN WITH ERASE IF...BUT YES, NO???? PLEASE GIVE ME SOME ADVICE THX!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 172.139.71.52 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC) If you are unsure of something, search for it on Wikipedia's help section. Wikipedia is also in other languages, so maybe contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language would be the most helpfull of you. Leyasu 01:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Macintosh User 16:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Hi. Can you explain why you used your admin rollback tools on this edit? If you can avoid using admin tools except for fighting vandalism, that would be appreciated. Cheers, [[Sam Korn ]] 20:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Think about it like this: protection powers are on account of being an admin, deletion powers are on account of being an admin, blocking powers are on account of being an admin. Rollback powers are also on account of being an admin.  You would not expect to use any of the other tools except due to vandalism (3RR and ArbCom blocks being the obvious exceptions), so there's no reason that rollback powers are anything different.  On top of that, it's a matter of courtesy: you can explain why the revert was needed in the edit summary.  It wasn't obvious exactly why you were reverting on that page, so an edit summary would have been helpful.  Cheers,  [[Sam Korn ]] 20:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I do see your point, but all the same it would be more polite and courteous to use useful edit summaries wherever possible.  [[Sam Korn ]] 21:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * And to you! Good luck with your GCSE btw - I was doing mine only eight months ago!   [[Sam Korn ]] 21:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I got 7 A*'s and 3 A's (in physics, biology and Greek). I keep getting people telling me I sound old: clearly I'm too pompous!   [[Sam Korn ]] 21:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * No, it's not generally a good idea to put that you're younger than 18 on a userpage. You get talked down to and insulted on account of it. It used to be there, till I pruned my page extensively a month ago. I just assume everyone to be male unless told otherwise, and still sometimes I forget then... Cheers, [[Sam Korn ]] 22:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Template_talk:Reli-bio-stub is the worst example of it for me. Since then I've resolved to a policy of boldness and anonymity!   [[Sam Korn ]] 22:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for quickly reverting the vandalism over at TV.com. I noticed on your user page that you live near Maidstone. Well, I live in Ashford and so I will just mention that you are probably the nearest Wikipedian to me and near the same age. --Thorpe 22:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * (reply) I was just contributing over at Requests for adminship and have seen some good people up for nomination, one I know from another project. I think back in spring or summer I nominated myself for adminship but I was turned down mainly for not putting in edit summaries. I usually put them in now so hopefully people will see I have improved. I wouldn't mind becoming an administrator since that'll be a great achievement for me ever here. I have been joined since January and you in July? So, you are newer here and are already an admin. Do you think I have the potential to be one then? --Thorpe 22:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I just realised you left another message on my talk page which I just mentioned here. If I get put up for nomination you'll support me then? --Thorpe 22:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * (reply) Thanks. I don't think I'll nominate myself because I did that last time. You are welcome to nominate me if you want. You will definitely get my respect and friendship. --Thorpe 22:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Feel free to add me to MSN Messenger. That's why I have the e-mail address on my user page so anyone can chat to me about Wikipedia and other stuff. --Thorpe 22:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. I'll be going onto MSN Messenger shortly. I'll start to make notes on my nomination for tommorrow. --Thorpe 22:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Happy holidays!


Hi, FireFox! I hope you have an enjoyable and relaxing winter break. :) Take care, Sango  123   (talk)  00:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

userbox: gemini
It seems to have an extraneous white line in it. What happened? Doovinator 04:39, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

3RR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Wisesabre

--DPSingh 11:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!
 M E R R Y C H R I S T M A S , ! Hope it's a wonderful one! (happy New Year, too!)-- Violin  G  irl ♪ 15:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)