User talk:49ersBelongInSanFrancisco/Archive 2

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah. The information I gave on the late Walter Patrick Bissell was 1000% accurate. I garnered the information from the book "People Who Dance". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dane Youssef2600:1700:AB10:3E40:5CD7:4E47:4141:3309 (talk) 06:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Please keep a watch on Yudirai account. He is the person vandalizing Mangalore related articles with poor Tulu content
I request you to please keep a watch on this user account Yudisthir Shivaprasad Rai Yudirai(talk). He is the same person who is repeatedly vandalizing Mangalore related articles with Tulu/Tulunadu content, using multiple accounts. Yesterday, the Mangalore article got protected from IP edits due to his Tulu related vandalisms. On 18th July 2018, the Tulu Nadu received page protection from his IP related vandalism. But, since Yudirai(talk) user is autoconfirmed, he again vandalized that article the very next day. He has also vandalized the Bunt (community) article as well. The user account Bunt56(talk) is a sock-puppet of Yudirai(talk). He could certainly vandalize the Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada articles once again. 223.186.240.27 (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Vandal IP series
42.109.129.29 this IP is repeating vandalism in Jomonte Suvisheshangal after warnings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:D28A:1AD0:111F:7E67:EA0C:42A3 (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

no seriously you said come here if i had questions and I have questions
Or is there a better way to contact you? Email is fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.225.220.46 (talk)

What's up? Please sign your comments by using "~" at the end of your comments. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:38, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I hope you are having a nice day! 68.225.220.46 (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! And thanks for signing your comment.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Red marquis/sandbox/Mechanical Animals Tour sandbox
What's with the speedy deletion tag? It's a personal sandbox. The contested material contained therein is not meant for publication in the final article. It is material I am going to be working off of in my own words once I get around to working on that article. I've already contested your speedy deletion request. -Red marquis (talk) 07:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Red marquis! Sorry to hear that you're frustrated. Unfortunately, the rules against copyrighted content apply in user space as well. Take a look at How to use your user space: "You can put more or less anything on your user page, as long as it does not break any other rules (for example, no copyright violations or insults directed at other users)". Also WP:USERFY: "Wikipedia's licensing requirements and the copyright policy apply to all pages posted anywhere on Wikipedia." Sorry again that it was a frustrating experience and I hope you continue editing! 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sam Kassoumeh
Hello 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sam Kassoumeh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: co-founding a notable company indicates significance. Thank you. So Why  05:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dumraon gharana
Hello 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dumraon gharana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''not about a band but a style of music. Consider merging with Dhrupad.''' Thank you. So Why  07:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello ,

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
 * Backlog

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
 * Coordinator

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for  making  the occasional  mistake while  others can learn from  their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
 * This month's refresher course

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
 * Deletion tags

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
 * Paid editing


 * Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
 * Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent  enhancements to  the New Pages Feed and  features in the Curation  tool, and there are still more to  come. Due to the wealth  of information  now displayed by  ORES, reviewers are strongly  encouraged to  use the system now rather than Twinkle; it  will  also  correctly  populate the logs.
 * Not English
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
 * Tools

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FrankySM4/LGBT adoption in the United States


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, FrankySM4/LGBT adoption in the United States, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lopifalko (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

RE: Republic of China Edit
Hey 49ers, thanks for fixing that edit. I was looking to revert the edit including a link to Taiwan, but forgot to I had a browser extension that does text replacement, and inadvertently made the edits you saw. I have disabled it now to prevent future issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KhazadSanci (talk • contribs) 05:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Reverted a bit of vandalism that you'd previously cleaned up. Just FYI.
Just FYI, I saw that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_F._Collins had been vandalised, and that you'd previously reverted the same vandalism. I cleaned it up but don't intend to watch that page for long, so I figured I might ping you. 174.113.14.25 (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco,

First and foremost, thank you for your username...as a life-long Niners fan, I believe they should have found a way to stay in the City, and despite their recent winning ways (and the Raiders impending move to LV), it remains difficult to be a Bay Area football fan while they play in the South Bay.

With regards to my recent edits to the Carrol Quigley submission, I don't believe that they necessitated citations to the extent that you have demanded. He is still the greatest historian of the 19th and 20th centuries, and perhaps the greatest that the world's history has ever seen.

The Wikipedia entry under his name is woefully under-researched, and I believed, that as a student of his works for over 15+ years, I would be singularly qualified to add several statements that attest to his prominence.

I would appreciate it if the powers that be would re-analyze my additions and maintain them. Upon such analysis, it will be clear that I did not vandalize the page.

- Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aangalet (talk • contribs) 09:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

vital capacity
Hello, I am a doctoral student and noticed a slight mistake in the vital capacity wiki. I tried to add a citation but have never edited a wikipedia page before :) Generally, with obstructive lung diseases (asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, etc.) lung volume is normal or increased because of air trapping as there is decreased alveolar elastic recoil. https://vula.uct.ac.za/access/content/group/9c29ba04-b1ee-49b9-8c85-9a468b556ce2/DOh/Module%204%20_Toxom%20II_/toxom2/NWHITE/Graphics/1-20.png

Hi 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco
Thank you for bringing the my mistake to my attention.

The reason for the Wikipedia article was a a reference to the business Lady Lash. Entering it's 10th year it has reached some big milestones and achievements.

The article was meant to be showcased like other similar business achievements on Wikipedia.

For instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sephora

If I am incorrect and you able to help identify the reason it appears differently?

Warm regards

Matt

Hi 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco
Thank you for bringing my mistake to my attention. But this is not a mistake. I saw some broken links on washing machine posts, so I thought that broken links are not the right sign for Wikipedia. So I gave a link to the post on my official website to fix them so that Wikipedia is not inaccurate in Google's eyes because of the broken link. Since I also wrote a washing machine-related article on my website, I thought that I should fix that broken link. Please do not change my link. I have not come here for any spamming. You can trust me. Thank You

Warm regards SumitUk17

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

Happy New Year!


49ersBelongInSanFrancisco, Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year   – news article. – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year Send New Year cheer by adding     to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 04:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Julie Carlson article
I see that you tagged the article for speedy deletion - then the page creator removed the deletion notice and edited the article. I've restored the article to the previous version with the deletion request on it. MurielMary (talk) 06:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

List of Yale University people article
Am I a joke to you? TheREALdanielkim (talk) 01:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello ,

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
 * Source Guide Discussion

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
 * Redirects


 * Discussions and Resources
 * There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
 * A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
 * A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
 * A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
 * Refresher

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Plese help me
Block this person he is a disgrace he is raisist he posted the n word on my sand box!!!! Vandalism!! 😡😡😡😡 Maokn (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello ,

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference. In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
 * Your help can make a difference
 * Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
 * Discussions and Resources
 * A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
 * Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
 * A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
 * Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Rat Parties edit rejection
Hi Apologies. I am new to this, have now read the guidelines and can see you were correct TimeGruV — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimeGruV (talk • contribs) 06:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism
You want to call facts vandalism? Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

In regards to the McCollough effect page
Hello, I hope you are doing well.

I'm writing this message simply to ask about the reversion of my edit within the McCollough effect page. I understand that my simple reversion of a well-meaning edit is, in many ways, unconstructive, especially given that this reversion was made by a non-logged in IP with no other edits. However, I would like to also point out that the edit being reverted was sudden and not discussed in the talk page, with the reversion in question mentioning the reasoning, and I was hoping to understand how such an edit may be either entirely unwarranted, or perhaps improved in the future.

Thank you for your time, and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.125.58 (talk) 06:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Usernames
Hello 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. Just a note that if you notice users who have a blatant corporate/organizational username and are also writing about their company/organization (eg. ), you can report them to WP:UAA.

The Twinkle tool is a very useful tool to simplify the reporting of users for username violations, vandalism, and other common maintenance tasks. If you haven't done so already, I highly recommend that you check out Twinkle and consider installing it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello ,



It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to and  who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to, , and who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
 * Year in review

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
 * Reviewer of the Year

As a special recognition and thank you has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
 * NPP Technical Achievement Award

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

bah
you're a jerk that didn't fix the error. but hey, you increased your edit count. well done! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.12.186.49 (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

We have been noticing your edits
49ersBelongInSanFrancisco,

We have been noticing your edits. It looks like you are trying to take out your personal grudge/anger on the organization through your edits. You are also trying to mislead the public by using terms like "linguistic chauvinism". We will be tracking your IP address and also your location and make a formal complaint to the cyber police. Please email me if you have any differences with the organization (jayeshgowdag@gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgs job (talk • contribs) 15:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Who died and made you god of the Crestone, Colorado page? I'm just trying to insert some honesty into the self-serving dreck that is currently on the page. Have you ever actually been to the place 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco?! It's a cesspit of people that are so geriatric and stoned that they have no idea of reality. They'll protest the dumbest crap, but they won't lift a finger to protest the Baca Grande POA or the town government that is ripping them off left and right. Seriously, Strong ruined the place by giving all the prime lots to these pseudo-religious organizations. No mention of how they divided the lots up in narrow little 1/4 acre lots, no mention how they essentially painted the roads to make them look like they were paved from the air, so they could sell lots to people that had never been here. There is no mention of how those same roads are still, after 40 years, not paved. No mention of embezzlement. No mention of anything negative. The article is a whack job to make the place seem like some Shangrila. And who in the hell calls this little dried up retirement village "New Age Religious capital of the world"?! And here you are, keeping the article whitewashed. Geh zum Teufel! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.41.160.19 (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you suspect sockpuppetry?
On the page West Hempstead, New York, the account For The Boyz was blocked for vandalism. Shortly after, the account Joeefnvyyhteb6 was created and more or less vandalized the same page and section (Notable people). I suspect sockpuppetry. Do you? Johnnyconnorabc (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I reported Joeefnvyyhteb6 to AIV immediately after their first edit because it seemed to be the same vandalism. I don't know if they're the same person, but they also seemed to be not interested in building an encyclopedia. Both users seem to be blocked now. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

but it didnt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot2kill97 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)