User talk:4quotes4me

Postage meter revert
I removed the source, that originally supported completely different prose, because of that fact and replaced it with a reliable published source: Gibbons Stamp Monthly is certainly NOT an obscure publication no one in the world has heard of. It has been published, almost continuously for over 100 years and Stanley Gibbons also publishes a well known stamp catalogue annually, so along with Linns Stamp News they are the two English language journals on the subject. Ask any serious stamp collector or philatelist and they will know SG immediately. The website http://www.stampnotes.com leaves something to be desired as it appears to be self-published so it's content may or may not be reliable: see WP:SELFPUBLISH and there are no links to the alleged publication in question. And I posted 4 hours after not one year later, as you state. Please get you facts straight and I suggest you familiarise yourself with wikipedia's policies. You may want to consider whether an editor with over 10 years on this wiki and more than 100,000 edits, many on philatelic related articles, might know a bit more about suitable citations then you do with just two edits. We all have to start somewhere a drive-by revert like this is not much appreciated, so I will reinstate what you removed. If you are not happy with that, then make you case on the article's talk page as we don't want this to deteriorate into an edit war. ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)