User talk:4realtz

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:4realtz/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:4realtz/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:4realtz/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:4realtz/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hersi Said (September 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hersi Said and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hersi Said, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hersi_Said Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lapablo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hersi_Said reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 19:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Hersi Said moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hersi Said, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hersi Ally Said moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hersi Ally Said, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hersi Ally Said


A tag has been placed on Hersi Ally Said, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Senzo Mbatha


A tag has been placed on Senzo Mbatha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, 4realtz. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Senzo Mbatha has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject  and which provide verifiable information. '''Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. '''Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles. A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged,as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is  here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

-- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 23:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Senzo Mazingiza for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Senzo Mazingiza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Senzo Mazingiza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Superceded by WP:G11 tagging. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hersi Ally Said moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hersi Ally Said, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 08:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hersi Ally Said (October 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hersi Ally Said and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hersi Ally Said, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hersi_Ally_Said Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hersi_Ally_Said reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

4realtz, just a comment about this: looking at the history of this draft, you have moved it from draftspace to mainspace three times and it was moved back three times because the lack of sources had not been addressed. It's good that you submitted it for review through Articles for Creation instead of just moving it back yet again, but you should consider the fact that it had been moved into draftspace for a reason, so submitting it without editing it at all was doomed to fail. By the way, if you should move the draft to mainspace without providing more sources about the person, I'm pretty sure it would be nominated for deletion instead of being moved back again. All the sources in the article now are about some other topic, Said's name is just mentioned in connection with that topic. What's required to show notability is multiple independent sources that are specifically about Said, and consist of more than a brief mention. --bonadea contributions talk 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hersi Ally Said for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hersi Ally Said is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hersi Ally Said until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello 4realtz. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:4realtz. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 07:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi &#128172;, First of all i need to thank you for taking your time and pass through my edits and found what you have said. It is not true that i get paid for the articles i create, its just i am new to Wikipedia and all those articles i create its either about some people which are notable in my country and well known as, but they have no article here on wikipedia about them, so as a beginner who Becomes addicted to wikipedia and want to improve my experience and later on start to help wikimedia foundation as administrator, so i keep on creating articles but about the peoples i know (not close to them). So as long as you have explain to what procedure to follow in order to start an article here, starting now i will follow the instructions provide. Thank you and i will still need your help to make sure i become a good user without violating wikimedia policies which is my desire. 4realtz (talk) 08:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you know "Tommy Flavour" personally or professionally? have you ever contacted him or someone close to him? also, what is your connection with user ? Thank you, GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 08:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * &#128172; I know "Tommy Flavour" Professionally. User This was my first user account on wikipedia, when i was starting learning about wikipedia, unfortunately i was blocked because of violating policies and they taught me how to make an appeal, i did and get rejected many times until i forgot my password, i tried to reset but it was asking to verify ownership in which i didn't understand till date. i asked one of wiki administrator on how i can merge or delete one of my user account, but they said wikipedia can not do that. Thank You 4realtz (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

U've been so quite. i Wish to ask you if i am allowed to continue with editings as usually or i should still wait for your permision? Thanks 4realtz (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Block notice
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Molee4real&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Molee4real. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Unfortunately, because of your statement above that the account belongs to you, I'm afraid I have to block this account from editing. In order to continue editing, you will need to appeal your block successfully, addressing the reasons why your former account was blocked and why the block is no longer necessary to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tommy Flavour
Hello, 4realtz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tommy Flavour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2021 (UTC)