User talk:4susanticks

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Lyme disease has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lyme disease was changed by 4susanticks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91282 on 2013-07-16T02:07:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello 4susanticks and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Lyme disease, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Scray (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Lyme disease article
Please cease edit warring on Lyme disease. Your advertisements on a singular product that is a reproduction of a half dozen similar products isn't relevant, unwarranted and highly WP:POV. A device that you described was patented in the mid 1800's. It was not very effective, indeed, it frequently ripped the head from the tick, leaving it embedded. The same is only variably true for forceps extraction of a tick. I've personally removed hundreds of ticks from humans over the decades. Only left one head imbedded, when I first was learning on how to extract a tick. It wasn't complicated. What you are doing is blatant advertising, which is impermissible to the point of blocking here.Wzrd1 (talk) 03:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)