User talk:4twenty42o/Archive3

Hi
So what needs to be cleaned up? I am new to this. Sorry. Any help would be appreciated. Mark T. Williams

Thank you
Much obliged to you for reverting vandalism on my user page. Best wishes, Jus  da  fax  18:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

World Genseiryū Karatedō Federation
Hi, are you available to help out here Talk:World_Genseiryū_Karatedō_Federation? -- Neil N   talk to me  15:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Latest chapter in saga here: User_talk:NeilN -- Neil N   talk to me  05:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism
theres no consensus for the version you like either. im not really making just but also adding things. so if someone keeps erasing that....--Eduen (talk) 04:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

well, Who rejects my changes and additions? other users just as me. so why should the version of the article of their liking should be given priority over my changes or also those of user Zazaban. They have reverted my changes but also erased my additions and other things they dont like while i have never erased their "anarcho" capitalism. I suggest you also speak to those to those other users, otherwise you could be accused of onesideness. now if you are also in the crusade to keep the "anarco" capitalist bias on that article you could very well speak out. this because you claim to be in your userpage a volunteer againts vandalism.--Eduen (talk) 04:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

"And you can bet you ass I would revert any of the above mentioned just as quickly if I felt that they were editing against consensus."

So can you expect something else from me or other users? and Who decides whats is consensus and whats not? Seems you already decided. I thought the point was reaching consensu since there wasnt one and so the edit war. Anyway they have also kept erasing things i added and so they can be accussed of vandalism. I havent really erased anything much really. Mostly argued order of things and less emphasis on minority fringe positions.--Eduen (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

well i hope you dont expect me to then think you and the users nihilo and Knights...are defending "neutral point of view" while im the "biased edit warrior". And also i will report vandalism when someone erases things like post left anarchism, christian anarchism, insurrectionary anarchism and individualist anarchism in Europe.--Eduen (talk) 05:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

H. Dale Jackson
Please explain the edit on H. Dale Jackson; specifically, removal of the section aboout his involvement in Arkansas and Missouri gambling ballot initiatives. Thank you. Moproducer (talk) 04:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Black Hispanic
Please to not swoop in and increase tensions even more you are not helping, there is edit warring going on and your friend Bab-a-lot has already reverted the same content more than 3 times against 2 other editors who have raised issue on the talk--Wikiscribe (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Cool (aesthetic)‎
Thanks for your edits on this article, and your comments on the talk page. Greatly appreciated! ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 23:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Three Mile Island revert
Hi. I had written this text "-* In a Saturday Night Live episode, references to radioactive damage is done in a sketch through various stereotypical consequences of radioactivity (falling hair in clumps, glowing)." in the TMI pop culture section; you reverted it saying it (in your opinion) was better suited in the snl page. So why not put the X-Men movie fact in the X-Men movie page? I feel - as a small snippet of info concerning "TMI in pop culture" and not relevant to the mentioned media - they both still belong on the TMI page. At most COPY them to the media pages, why remove? Care to comment? Thanks. --151.16.142.246 (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Sorry - forgot to log in. --David Be (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Croatian Ground Army
are you reverting all my updates, ffs stop it, I am trying to clean up the mess some idiot posted, only to see you reverting it back... Article is full in inaccuracies and ppl gonna only laugh at it, stop reversing my work, unless you prefer for article to remain inaccurate. Mic of orion (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I've done that in discussion section but the thing won't let me post it, or servers are slow, w'e the case... Mic of orion (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I have only one account, Mic of Orion, I just didn't log on, that is all, now that I am longed on I changed it, but thing takes time, now in discussion section I have ended up with 3 modernization stubs, quite annoying... I don't log in to wiki a lot, but when I do, I do so bc I want to edit the article as it is full of inaccuracies, sometimes I do it without logging on if minor changes is all that is needed, but as I have life other than wiki... Mic of orion (talk) 13:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Bye and Happy Christmas


''Please accept my advanced Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.I will not be able to wish you on those days as I will be taking a Wiki break for one month starting tomorrow. Also wishing you a Happy editing.. :) '' arun  talk  06:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Er, why?!
Hi, I was just about to log on a couple of mins ago. The ip I've just been assigned (randomly) by my ISP showed "messages pending", so I clicked through to see what it said. Here's the address: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.1.182.144&redirect=no It appears you made a 'revert to old' and left a brief message. As I said, I was not actually responsible personally for the edit in question (the person assigned this IP last time was) but still, I think I'm inclined to agree with their request for more referenced sourcing of the claims, which begs the question: Why did you revert? I'm interested to know, if only to find out whether I've been doing something wrongly myself for the last 7 yrs or so! I'm not asking in an 'aggressive' or challenging way, merely a lazily interested point of order. Many thanks Codeye (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

M24 Sniper Weapon System
You reverted my removal of the conversion from AMR to MOA accuracy and said "Just because you cannot read it does not means its untrue" My question is can you read it? If you can read it I would be interested to know the formula used to make the conversion. My understanding is that citations for articles are supposed to be in the article's language.

I've spoken with a two mathematicians, explained AMR and MOA as used in the article, and they both said there is no way to convert between the two. I've searched the internet quite a bit and have not been able to find any conversion either. The idea of using variance and normalization to convert between the two is simply not able to give you a conversion it can get you a very very rough guess at best. It's like trying to convert apples into oranges. Fordag (talk) 04:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Eli Soriano and Daniel Razon articles
Hi, I have recently nominated the article dedicated to the unnotable Daniel Razon on an AfD but as no knowledgeable person participated, and because a trick was pulled (i.e. a faux RS was dropped and then the pro-keep editor went straight to ANI and reqested a speedy closure during the times that I am usually absent due to time zone differences) the decision of the speedy closure ended up as "keep".

Now, as a result of this tragic event, the same pro-keep editor experienced a high morale boost and, as expected, as soon as he started editing in favor of the subject a Soriano droid came crawling up from the sewers and started making complementary edits specifically adding local award nominations, unnotable awards, blogs and ADD-owned websites as references, and cajoling the said pro-keep editor to obliterate well-sourced information regarding Soriano's rape case etc. Here is a sample edit.

Consider this conversation. Those who have enough experience in dealing with all ADD related articles and familiar with the results of all checkusers that I've requested are fully-aware that this anon, just like all others, cannot be an impartial editor but another follower of the cult with probably dozens of socks. I would just like to give you a heads up on both articles, especially their respective talk pages. Thank you! – Shannon Rose Talk 19:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

My dad was an Army pilot ...
He once snuck me up in a rotary engine (?) plane called (I think) a Beaver. (I forget, but it sounds right, and fitting. LoL) Beside me in the jump seat was a funnel and tube thing ... which made me think of those old Navy movies where people are talking into tubes ... and so I put the funnel thing up to my mouth and talked into it. My father then informed me of what the funnel was for, there being no latrine on the plane. End of my Army stories. :-)

A quick salute to you, most honorable (if "F"oul-mouthed LoL) 4twenty42o as 2010 begins ... May there be wondrous delights for you and yours in the coming year.

I think of you as someone you'd want beside you when the shit hits the fan.

NOTE: I have memorialized the comment you once made about Proofreader77's editing on a controversial article ... at the top of my user and talk pages ... which I have spruced up real nice for 2010. :-) Cheers. Proofreader77 (interact) 20:28, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Apology
hey i wanted to apologize. i still think [am sure actually] that i am right about that source so that the article is too much "own research" but i was being way too silly. if you want to review the edit more closely any time then do so. i'd say the same to RepublicanJacobite but i can't edit his page. best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.54.18 (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Cockness Monster
So beautiful :,) - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Arbcom notice: 1953 Iranian coup POV
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Eli Soriano article again
Hi 4twenty42o,

If you are not so busy, your help in keeping an eye on the above article will be much appreciated. It's deja vu once again with anon's whitewashing and deceptive edit summaries. Thanks! – Shannon Rose Talk 15:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello again 4twenty42o,


 * As an editor who have contributed much on the article, I hope you find the time to comment on this discussion. Cheers! – Shannon Rose Talk 15:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think a third-party opinion regarding the subject. Here is a brief background regarding the article:
 * Shannon Rose insists that Soriano is notable as a fugitive.

180.191.61.141 (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Shannon Rose continues, as always, to criticize Soriano by calling his church "notorious, cult, etc.." (good faith, isn't it).
 * Shannon Rose (jumps to conclusions) and decides to reject a recent award given to the subject.
 * I, the anon, felt sorry for Shannon Rose's impartial view on the subject. (claiming many negative things about the subject, i.e "notably notorious in using all the tricks in the book")

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Reverting to obviously irrelevant links
A few minutes ago I corrected a link to a page which was obviously irrelevant to a discussion to link into a discussion which is relevant. You have restored the old (bad) link. Please advise your reason for doing this. 78.151.89.253 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC).

Please see my reply to your last post on my talk page. 78.151.89.253 (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see my reply to your further post of a few minutes ago on my talk page. 78.151.89.253 (talk) 10:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see my reply to your further post of a few minutes ago on my talk page. 78.151.89.253 (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see my reply to your further post of a few minutes ago on my talk page. 78.151.89.253 (talk) 11:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

hey........why u warn me whats the point ill just keep vanadalizing.Just saying oh ya how do u edit stuff GOOD LIKE.Its real confusin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farmerboy99100 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Constant reverting of genres
I am responding to your warning not to revert edits to the genre of the anime series Ichiban Ushiro no Dai Maō. The user Farix has been reverting the change of not just me but at least a half dozen other signed up or not signed up users to change the genres to include harem. If you look at the discussion based on that page he keeps sighting the reliable third-party source but there is one big problem with that. Farix already stated in the history that on June 12, 2010 that the show did not follow the traditional norms but that is his/her own opinion. If you do any search for this show on the net you can find people talking about it being a Harem. I also watched every episode and say the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrimoireMyst (talk • contribs) 21:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi
You put up a clean up tag on the article for Mark T. Williams and I am just very curious as to why. How is this article not neutral? Any help would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.221.211 (talk) 22:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Maelstrom (band)
Hello. I am the creator of this page. And you have nominated twice now this article for speedy deletion. I respect your right to nominate any article for a deletion, however I do not believe it fits the criteria for an Article destined for Speedy Deletion. I would like to know your reasoning for this, and I would like to dispute any claims to the best of my ability. If my page truly is not wikipedia material, and after a debate on the subject material, I will agree to have it deleted. Nonetheless I would like to contest any arguments you have declaring it not appropriate for the online encyclopedia Maelstromlusby (talk) 04:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Only one time did I delete the tags. And my page does indeed fit some of the criteria listed at []. 4: Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country. The band is support for Toxin on their tour. 7: Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city. Maelstrom has thoroughly dominated the Southern Maryland music scene, as well as currently impacting the Baltimore Maryland music scene. 9: Has won or placed in a major music competition. First off Major is a weasel word because there is no definition of what a Major competition is in that article. However the group did indeed place first in Power Jam Music Alliance's Annual Battle of the bands, which covers a mass extent of bands, beating out groups from several states. All of this information is 100% verifiable from PJMA (pjma.info) and DC Metal Stations websites, along with various other local newspaper articles advertising the events. Therefore meeting Three of the listed criteria. The page you suggested quotes "may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria". I greatly appreciate you directing me to this page by the way. And would you kindly give me advice or instruction on how to establish the notability of this band to whoever has nominated the article for deletion? Thank you for your time Maelstromlusby (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so very much I have contacted the person I need to speak to about establishing notability Maelstromlusby (talk) 04:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Erin Andrews
Whats your problem about vandalism? I have added the reference. Please do your homework as well before labeling as vandelism. You could have used the word, change in good faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.154.172.34 (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Why have you removed my change? Does it not conform to your imaginations or something can you please look at the link I had added as reference. http://bumpshack.com/2009/08/04/erin-andrews-brunette-high-school-photo/

Else you can search on google about erin andrews brunette. If you dont have any answers then you can just tell me that you prefer a blonde Erin Andrews, but please dont label my page for vandalism cuz you are not correct here. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Just curious if you even cared to look at the reference link or else used google or just plain enjoy bullying those you can? I would prefer a more civilized answer. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok I did edit my comment and while I was doing that I knew you would notice. However it was just to stress on the point that please be a little objective, and look at the reference if it is provided rather than shooting someone down. By the way from your comment I am not sure if you still believe it was vandalism or in good faith. For the assistance part could you please google about the comment and then decide to mark it as "unimportant detail" or leave as such rather than marking it as vandalism. And in case now you dont think it was vandalism could you please take out the vandalism comment on my page and warning on my page. Please do add it back if sometime you do see my doing wrong. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

So you did look at the reference. Then I wonder why you still called it vandalism? What was wrong about that? Let me know if there is still something wrong in my language here. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 10:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Whether it is encyclopidic or or an unimportant detail that should be shot down can be discussed on her discussion page. I have added a section over there. However thats a different talk from the discussion about whether it was vandalism or not, that may be be discussed here as you have the authority to judge it and add warnings on my page and I do not. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 10:22, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I was trying to add the reference and move it to another section. I undid the change as the lines dont have to be copied again. Ok I did take the short cut of adding the reference directly and not talking to you as I thought I would not have time to come back an make this edit again once you reply. And I assumed you would look at the reference and not take any big actions. However I have ended up spending too much time on this unimportant detail. I was upset at the way two people quickly added warnings without going through the detail. I leave it to you to remove it from my page or not as I was not wrong here. You seem to have already made your decision, but I would expect someone trusted at your level by wikipedia to put the things where and when they are applicable. 67.154.172.34 (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

July 10
So, do you even know what an IGBT is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.253.102 (talk) 09:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Violation of Human Rights Law
You cannot remove my views on a topic from a talk page unless my views are likley to encite violence you are in direct violation of the Chater on Fundamental Rights of the European Union http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf Chapter 2 Article 11 The right to Freedom of expression and information

1 - Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall inclde the freedom to hold opinions and to recieve and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority regardless of frontiers.

Also my views were directly related to the topic and the racist views held within. it cannot be constued as vandalism. and in any case removal of my views from a talk page not an article page is illegal under human rights laws, i will restore my post againJse1986 (talk) 11:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI I have now blocked this editor. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Correct usage of English
I took the time to correct misspellings in an article into correct English, but you changed it back! Please use correct English in future and do not change back edits such as mine, which are correcting spelling errors in articles into the true form, as opposed to misspelt bastardised/slang versions.

A thousand thank yous —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Barry Czechoslovakia (talk • contribs) 12:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello sorry about that im new.
use this please for Info http://vac-acc.gc.ca/youth/sub.cfm?source=feature/week2006/vw_edres/animalswar_news/page3 (( Its public Info))

This is regarding Gander the Newfoundland Dog. I was trying to upload a pic of Gander, and also some information you are missing. I am from Gander Newfoundland and know that he was on the base here. there is allot more info on this great dog. Please add more info and a pic of him. Botwood was a navel airbase in newfoundland and was part of the Gander Base. SEE town of Gander NL, and if you could add a link to the town site it would be appreciated. Thanks Terry72.45.118.250 (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.118.250 (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Redirect
Yes I know i am trying to fix a article someone messed up--Yankeesman312 (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Habbox
I dont own habbox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xoim (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Chicken or the egg
Your "vandalism" accusation is baseless. Could you please state concisely what purpose the theology section serve on this subject? And why not include every other theological world view instead of just the Judeo-Christians'? I'm going to go ahead and edit it yet again, and if you block my IP address, things won't go very well.

State concisely what purpose the Judeo-Christian section serve on this topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.111.165 (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Bogdan Bogdanović
Just out of curiosity – what was wrong here? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Trading Cards
Hi Chris. Thanks for the note(s) about external links. Was thinking the cards might be considered added value, but am admittedly a bit of a novice at wikipedia editing! Is there a way where linkage to the project is acceptable? The project is non-commercial, open source, open access and the cards are a great rescource (especially for children). Anyway, you can read more here. Thanks again for the heads up, and apologies for any inconvenience. Cheers, Dave --User:Drdaveng (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Red Dawn
Hi... what gives with the blanket restore of an old page at Red Dawn? Markvs88 (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * humph..LOL im not sure how i did that... i was trying to wikilink attrition warfare and war of attrition... i think i got lost in the article er something...? nice catch!! Cheers - 4twenty42o (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It was pretty impressive... maybe somekind of hotkey snafu. (I'm the guy that put most of the citations into that article, so needless to say I was surprised! LOL!) Best, Markvs88 (talk) 18:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)