User talk:5.102.204.226

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 5.102.204.226, has made edits to International School of Temple Arts that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Peaceray (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to International School of Temple Arts, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''A single source alleging that the International School of Temple Arts might be a cult does not justify labeling it as a cult. Therefore your categorizeing it as a cult is what we call original research. Furtheremore, your characterization of my removal up unverified caracterization as vandalizism fails to address the reason for removal, specifically no ciations from a reliable source, & fails to assume good gaith. '' Peaceray (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neotantra. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)