User talk:5.129.59.116

Adding the section about reserve components of Russian Armed Forces and its subsequent removing
I have added the section "Military reserve and military reserve force" into the article "Russian Armed Forces". This section is based on the text of Russian Federation Federal Law of 28 March, 1998, №53-FZ "About military duty and military service". The section does not include any original research - just law quotes. The text of section had the link to the full text of aforenamed law, placed on the website pravo.gov.ru The website pravo.gov.ru is the official state system of russian legislation, administered by Russian Government. This website is the source for official publication of russian laws (russian laws enters into force after publication on this website). Thus, this website is reliable source with regard to the article about Russian Armed Forces. Unfortunately, this site has russian version only (this is not surprising taking into account the purpose of this site), but I think the information about reserve components of Russian Armed Forces is very important for english-speaking Wikipedia's visitors, and bearing in mind the absence of actual english version of russian laws in english-speaking sources I think it should be guided by official russian sources. As for my part I just can offer to check out the link, I've done in the text of section, and to read the text of aforenamed russian law (articles 51.2, 52, 53, 54, 57.1, 57.2, 57.3) if your knowledge in russian language is well. Anyway, the rules of verifiability provides for using non-english reliable sources.5.129.59.116 (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi 5.129.59.116. Thank you for the message.  First, while English is preferred, sources are not required to be in English.  I think the biggest problem here is the source you do have is a primary source, which typically is not allowed.  What I suggest is to start a discussion on the articles talk page with the sources you have so you can gain consensus to add the content.  I would imagine active editors of the article are likely to be competent with the Russian language. I hope this information is helpful.  Thanks again. S0091 (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

New message from Novem Linguae
– Novem Linguae (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Vesuvio14. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Russia under Vladimir Putin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Vesuvio14 (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm TheresNoTime. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Putinism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. - TheresNoTime 😺 13:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Putinism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Baden-Paul (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)