User talk:5.170.44.199

November 2019
Your recent editing history at Left- and right-hand traffic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * No edit war; see User_talk:Captainllama --5.170.44.199 (talk) 15:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You are in danger of violating the 3RRrule. That is edit warring. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm doing nothing else that writing here, and on talk page of user which has do the unmotivated roll back, but it don't reply, nobody reply about the edits facts/reasons; and, my reasons (e.g. no source for Rome and Milan changes) was already written... but nobody reply even on this, just rollback. :(   --5.170.44.199 (talk) 16:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You are edit warring. Please stop or you will be blocked. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * (Copy-pasted from Captainllama's talk page for clarity):
 * i don't like the wrong and not polite way you move;


 * can you please note that there is nothing about what appenned in italy after 1927? whole RHT or whole LHT?


 * can you please note that Rome and Milan RHT vs. LHT change have no source, and is not relevant as what appened on whole italy about this after 1927?


 * can you please note that info about Lancia and AlfaRomeo RHD can be reported as export version car's mainly, and only in second way for some italian people who like a RHD car on a RHT system?


 * --5.170.44.199 (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)


 * (fix) --5.170.44.199 (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi 5.170.44.199 (talk), I apologise if you have found me impolite that was not my intention. Your original edit deleted some content, and rearranged other content so its meaning was subverted. I reverted that as it was obviously not ok. I am not the only editor to have reverted your subsequent edits. If you wish to press the issue, the way forward is not to keep on hammering away at the same edit, but to take it to the talk page for the article and explain there what you want to do. If other editors agree then you have a consensus for the change you wish to make. Best wishes, Captainllama (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)