User talk:5.172.232.76

Not interested. Your comments do not indicate any likelihood of productive discussion about the article - quite the reverse in fact. Guy (Help!) 19:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Listen up, you, JzG an Roxy the Wolf. You do not indicate any likelihood of productive discussion about the article either, because you somehow cannot grasp the fact that I was talking about the article, not Wikipedia's attitude in general. In fact, you act as if you are protecting the status quo of the article at all costs and avoiding a discussion, because you seem to not have enough arguments to bust my claims. You didn't assume good faith whatsover. But let me tell you something: your lines and actions can only scare off kids from primary scary. Now for me you two are definitely persons who got paid to state that everyone who doesn't agree with the article, should get muted. Persuade me that I'm wrong, maybe? Wkurzyliście mnie kurwa, wy sprzedajne dziwki, idźcie lizać dupę swojemu ukochanemu, zamkniętego na wiedzę Jimmy Wales, tak jak on liże dupę koncernom farmaceutycznym i z tego ma hajs. Now when I already showed you some verbals, you can return them or admit that I suck as a potential member of this community; doesn't matter, cause my opinion about admins supervising this article probably can't get worse.

Watch out, because I won't forget this ignorant treatment, and I might be back in a few months and strive to prove among more user-friendly admins and bureaucrats, stewards, Reddit users, whatever, that in that very discussion it were you, who conducted unlawfully. If I can write essays, I can deal with bureaucracy too. You know, you might have 14 years of service and renown, and all, but I can be 532 left-wing thought police member too. I can be back after a long time and this time act in 'change X to Z' manner. I'm only afraid, that my view on alternative medicine is just 120 degrees different to that which the article strongly suggests. (You'd revert my changes then, wouldn't you?)

I can talk productively about the article. right?! But I cannot accept the fact how Wikipedia presents this topic, thus I cannot propose anything which wouldn't destroy 80 % of the content! Get it?

Sigh, I'm tired of this 'no-lifing', maybe we can have some laughter together to farewell in peace? --5.172.236.53 (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)The Polish Onion

IPs used by this user so far:

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.172.232.76
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.172.236.53
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.172.238.93
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/37.248.156.119
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/31.0.122.95

--02:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)