User talk:5.51.29.223

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Walmart have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Reb1981 (talk) 01:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2021
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Al Mahbes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. M.Bitton (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Stop your vandalism
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Al Mahbes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;


 * 1) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. [

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Western Sahara.

All my work are sourced. You are doing the wiki community a disservice with your ideology, then stop your vandalism or give us references You are making an edit war wich is not good for wiki community
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 1) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may will be blocked If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. − 	You remove with impunity our contributions, however referenced, without reasons, it is vandalim which harms the interests of the community and works of wiki, I will be forced to report it to the moderators next tim − 	5.51.29.223 (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Marmandie&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Marmandie. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)