User talk:5.61.169.51

March 2020
Hello, I'm Info-Screen. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Luisa Neubauer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I also responeded to your comment on my talk page Info-Screen::Talk 20:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luisa Neubauer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &thinsp;3125A Talk! Edits!&thinsp; 20:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Luisa Neubauer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &thinsp;3125A Talk! Edits!&thinsp; 20:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)


 * It seems that you are especially focused on the article. &thinsp;3125A Talk! Edits!&thinsp; 21:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

YOU are edit warring not us!
Cite your references. Again, talk on the article's talk page. You may get blocked for edit warring. &thinsp;3125A Talk! Edits!&thinsp; 14:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)