User talk:5.91.60.63

January 2020
Hello, I'm Plandu. I noticed that in this edit to Deströyer 666, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plandu (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Deströyer 666. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

The limit of acceptable challenging
Hi 5.91.60.63,

while removing disputed information about living people may have been acceptable, and exempt from the edit warring policy, you did more than that. You have repeatedly re-introduced non-neutral, challenged statements without a citation that directly supports the addition.

Best regards ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)