User talk:50.107.136.78

Pending Changes Section
That's new to me. The IP talk page referenced was for IP 74...'s talk page. 50.107.136.78 (talk) 13:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Burney Relief, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop adding "museum piece." It's already implied, unhelpfully useless, and is bad grammar.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The piece wasn't always in a museum is the reason for stating what it only is "now." I'm adding "is now a museum piece" to the article if you were to use good reasoning in your argument about the vandalizing of Wikipedia being alleged or concluded, I guess?  The article states the museum it is actually in, in immediate context, and shortly states it was in a private collection of interest after being rejected by the same museum earlier.  Please explain what will be the grammar's usage needed to not state it without bad grammar in the article?  Although not welcoming, thanks for a discussion for conflict resolution if you continue here with what is not intended as vandalism but as a work at preventing poor editing technique and reasoning that is the real solution sought after in discussion that encouraged, nothing more for the Burney Relief article's development. 50.107.136.78 (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That opening is a little Alliterative, also? It's the very first laudatory fact and association developed, was one of my notes also. 50.107.136.78 (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)