User talk:50.108.89.58

July 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I was blocked for "Vandalism" after undoing vandalism
So if you undo an Administrator's edit, you'll be blocked for vandalism. Gotcha. The question, for future reference, was
 * I'll be happy to remove the word "persistent", if you think that's necessary. That "legitimate question" was of course just a bunch of racist trolling. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

"Is there any particular reason why the term "Jewish" has been carefully scrubbed from the article prose completely? It is notably absent from the "early life" and "personal life" sections. Mr. Epstein is ethnically Jewish, closely associates with prominent Jewish individuals such as Alan Dershowitz and has dated prominent Jewish figures such as Ghislaine Maxwell (daughter of Robert Maxwell). The word Jewish is very relevent to his biolography. It seems pointless to try and hide his ethnicity here, when his name is "Epstein" as well. I mean the tactic might work if he was called John Smith or Jim Brown, but what is the point here?"

Even if it were "racist" (I don't see that here), what warrants it's complete removal, rather than just the removal of "racist" parts? And how is it vandalism for undoing YOUR removal of the question? except that you said that I was blocked for "persistent vandalism". not trolling. That post was a question about the removal of content from the article, not "trolling". i even looked on the vandalism article linked above, it says nothing about trolling.
 * No, if you are trolling, or revert someone who removed troll posts, you get blocked for trolling. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I skimmed over the vandalism article, nothing that i've done, or the user that posted that comment has done, constituted anything specified in the policy. In fact it seems you might have violated this policy yourself by "Illegitimately deleting or editing other users' comments. However, it is acceptable to blank comments constituting vandalism, internal spam, or harassment or a personal attack.".

So that's just it?
An administrator can vandalize a talk page, then block a user who undoes that vandalism, and the Administrator can simply claim that he was removing "racism" and "trolling", and the user remains blocked? That's actually sickening. I no longer trust Wikipedia from this alone. Is this seriously what goes on? You question the edits made by other editors, and your question is immediately removed. I'm done here, and I'm not editing or using Wikipedia again.


 * Please read aspersions. I've added 3 hours to your block for casting aspersions and making personal attacks.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't think "vandalism" quite fits. More like nothere. Not sure why Drmies was gave such a short block.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Dlohcierekim, I figured it was just a drive-by IP. I guess they found something, a cause, to sink their teeth into. Drmies (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I've made a single edit, and suddenly i'm "not here to build an encyclopedia". And then my block is extended for "casting aspersions and making personal attacks". What I said about Drmies was correct, not a personal attack. He illegitimately removed talk page content based on his own personal opinion. That only goes to fortify my feelings about Wikipedia. I'm done, and I hope that other people see what happened to me and realize that Wikipedia is screwed. You aren't allowed to question the actions of other editors.
 * You're allowed to question them: you could have asked me why I removed that content in the first place. Simply undoing, on your very first edit and without an explanation, an action that a somewhat experienced administrator has done, an action that administrator marked as "trolling", that's disruptive. You don't walk into someone's house and piss on the rug. Drmies (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * My impression as well. ANd I never piss on the rug without asking "Mother, may I"?  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, your editing looks like that of someone who came here to kick sand in other users' faces over some issue you brought in from the outside world. Like reinserting trolling is trolling.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)