User talk:50.117.137.126

April 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, List of North American countries by population. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ASUKITE 02:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Snowmanonahoe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sources for the historicity of Jesus seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * This piece of garbage ad for Jesus has been proven by actual scientists to be fallacious. This article is in no way neutral and is in fact nothing more than the constant pathetic cries from the believers of this one of interminable "religions". These "sources" are a complete joke as none of them were alive when the so called "Jesus" was alleged to be alive. That's like a scientist taking the word of someone who admits they only heard about it from second, third, fourth, etc., hand sources. That's called gossip, not science. All actual science has led to the conclusion that there is no actual evidence that this figure ever existed. There have been exhaustive studies from actual scientists using the scientific method. The Romans were meticulous bookkeepers and historians and not one shred of evidence is found within Roman history. All accounts about this myth have been shown to be nothing more than gossip that has been repeated ad nauseam to the point where even the believers can't agree.
 * This type of biased garbage journalism is what will ultimately destroy wikipedia. I have patronized wikipedia in the past, but I will no longer support it in any way until this crap is removed. 50.117.137.126 (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Historical Jesus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.