User talk:50.192.189.122

October 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pizza in the United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 20:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced and unverifiable content to Wikipedia as you did to Pizza in the United States. Wikipedia is based on reliable, verifiable, neutral (third-party) sources, which must be cited if an entry is challenged or is likely to be challenged. See Identifying reliable sources, Verifiability, No original research and Neutral point of view. Please also note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog or a forum. You also may find the following pages have useful information about What Wikipedia is not, Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style. Donner60 (talk) 02:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. oknazevad (talk) 12:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Imminent77. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Julio Frenk— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Imminent 77   (talk)  03:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Julio Frenk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Imminent 77   (talk)  03:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Julio Frenk. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Julio Frenk
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Julio Frenk), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bel-Shamharoth (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nachos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  22:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago-style pizza, you may be blocked from editing.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  22:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Julio Frenk.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  22:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 22:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.