User talk:50.196.213.1

Regarding your recent edit on IOS version history
I was unable to find any sources to verify your claim that the original version for shipping iPhone 6S and 6S Plus devices was 9.0.1. Additionally, it appears that those devices were first shipping as of September 19th, and iOS 9.0.1 wasn't released until September 23rd. Despite iOS 9.0.1 releasing 2 days before the launch date of the 6S/Plus, it's not possible for the first devices delivered to consumers to have been running it out-of-the-box. Alex460 (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your edits to Nanokernel
Nanokernel has been a redirect to Microkernel since 2008. In yesterday you overwrote the redirect with the text

Nanokernels are a small kernel type like Microkernel

and added a software-stub.

I reverted you with the edit summary "Let's keep the redirect unless a decently sourced article can be written." Today you have returned and have undone this to your 1-liner, without leaving an explanation or edit summary.

Let's disregard that you don't punctuate; let's disregard that the stub template is wrong; let's disregard that you do not categorize the stub. Your eight words-long stub has less information than Microkernel and is in effect only a less precise redirect, and it is not worth keeping.

I am going to revert you again. Should you wish to build a sourced Nanokernel article my suggestion is that you do it through WP:AFC. Should you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. Should you consider undoing again without discussion, please have a read on WP:BRD. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone 6S. --Yamla (talk) 13:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Ban evasion
Note that this vandal is known to evade the block using primarily IPv6 addresses. These include a number of addresses prefixed with 2602:306:cfc5:6240, including Special:Contributions/2602:306:CFC5:6240:5184:EEA5:36E9:64F4, [[Special:Contributions/2602:306:cfc5:6240:c45a:d9c4:7ad7:fb51. --Yamla (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * You - the person - are banned from Wikipedia. You are not welcome here; any edits you make will be reverted on discovery and your account/IP blocked on sight. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note that you may be unblocked at some point, but not while you continue to deliberately evade your block. You are deliberately causing work for other people at the moment. Time to take a step back and figure out why your edits are always being reverted by a multitude of other editors. --Yamla (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Can I still read? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFC5:6240:7421:37AD:205C:C7BE (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocking/banning only bars write access. A blocked/banned user may still read Wikipedia articles/pages. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

This user continued to evade the ban using User:Paleontologist99. --Yamla (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andy Hurley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Hurley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
First edit after a long-term block expired; vandalism. IP blocked again, anon-only, this time for longer. Logged-in editors will still be able to edit via this address. -- The Anome (talk) 17:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Necctaylor ( chat ) 19:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 50.196.213.1! Your additions to St. Thomas Church and Convent have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dynamics (music)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  20:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)