User talk:50.200.200.195

Category:Lists of college football statistical leaders by team
Please stop adding the category "Lists of college football statistical leaders by team" to individual players. Look at that category. It's for articles that are lists for entire teams. It is never used for articles about individual football players. Jhn31 (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Do NOT put individual player articles into that category. Jhn31 (talk) 12:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)


 * this individual player article is valid for the listed category: 'Lists of college football statistical leaders by team', so far as the subgroup 'California Golden Bears football statistical leaders' is also included. your deletions border on scurrilous defamation of the article's overall scope, as a Nigeria stub. you may want to add the stub designation and defer your edits to a bot. please do not vandalize this article by any further deletions. this is your last first and only warning. famousniner  (talk) 7:58am, 3 September 2017

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Iheanyi Uwaezuoke. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Iheanyi Uwaezuoke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Iheanyi Uwaezuoke was changed by 50.200.200.195 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895092 on 2017-09-04T06:23:45+00:00.

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Iheanyi Uwaezuoke, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Bagumba (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi
Thanks for trying to expand the article. Your edits were reverted because it looks like most of your text was unsourced. The citations go after what they are citing, not in a group at the end of the article. The article was also not formatted good and used non-neutral language. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi
warning: image: African Sports Star Iheanyi Uwaezuoke as photogenic alias-'ehani' .jpg' is a time sensitive piece. it appears in the current version without its original captioning and as such has been contentiously edited. original captioning: "In 2000, Uwaezuoke (photographed here during the 94th season in the history of...."

the following are other rights protected images that may be used with the current version: http://armchairgm.wikia.com/wiki/File:Player_profile_Iheanyi_Uwaezuoke.jpg,

50.200.200.195 has completed a version based on the notations above: formatting, non-neutral language, text sourcing, and most important: disambiguation of the subjects nationality, amateur and professional accomplishments. by expressing "no opinion" it appears that WikiOriginal-9 and all have fully deferred material content editing on this subject to: 50.200.200.195. as such talk page consensus is superfluous. please confirm this by restoring the version with the following lead: "...is a Nigerian former professional football player in the National Football....". then add the article to your respective watch lists, so that you can instantly view the recently completed version which reflects the above notations made by: WikiOriginal-9 (talk 6:54 Sept. 6th 2017)

Talkback
—Bagumba (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

photo removal and recategorization
since the consensus for the article on: iheanyi uwaezuoke was "no opinion" and no reply to the request to restore prior version for further edititing, the image: african sports star... has been removed and will only reappear with the fully disambiguated version and coplete caption it was created with. also the Category "american football" is replaced with "gridiron football" and "professional football" in the lead for complete disambiguation of the subject's nationality. any contentious undoing of these will result in the entire article being reverted to a stub. all prior records for this article confirm that 50.200.200.195, in fact has provided the most up to date factual content and just as other editors saw it fit to revert to a less complete version, non contentious motives should have encouraged those same editors to restore and wait for a finished product. as such those editors should excuse themselves from further interuption of work in progress with this particular article unless you have significant material sources to add to text. (talk 6:54 Sept. 6th 2017)

September 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as done at Iheanyi Uwaezuoke. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Comment
The reason that the professional career section of the prior version of the article was reverted is because it had no sources while the current version does. You have to place WP:inline citations after each sentence to show what each reference is for. You can still find the prior version of the page in the article history, you can work on it in the WP:sandbox if you can find sources for those things. You need to find sources for things like "Regarded as a top 40 first year player (out of roughly 1500 total) in the NFL". WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

final warning
I have reviewed (and versed myself) with your technical mumbo jumbo in the the section "september 2017" above. it would only be considered if your block actions had any validity. a separate page on this subject has been created and is published an a non wikipedia' platform. clearly WikiOriginal-9 (talk) have engaged in very damaging contentious editing of the article: iheanyi uwaezuoke. specifically by including categories: "American football wide receivers" and "American football return specialists" and generally including the term American in the lead paragraph. even after warnings that such texts ambiguate the subjects ethnic identity and nationality. even after being offered alternative terminology. you risk damage beyond accademia by misrepresenting a person's identity. i don't believe i speaking to people wh undestang that. in fact i am sure that you don't understand. as well the original caption to the image "african sports star iheanyi uwaezuoke as photogenic alias: ehani", should always appear with this image. you have intentionally omited this image caption. and reverted back to versions without the caption which falsify the the timeline of the image. the timeline of the image postdates the subjects professional career. this is an integral aspect of the entire body of work for the entry which you tagged as: "in poor shape." neither of you are the originator of the image. nor do you have any knowledge of it's timeline as you have confessed by offering "no opinion". you have intentionally declined to use rights protected image options offered by the primary editor. you have blocked the primary editor, who by all accounts and denials is the only one who has actively sourced text for the most up to date and factual version of this article. the sourcing details referenced in the comment section above do not warrant your actions and the information referenced: "Regarded as a top 40 first year player (out of roughly 1500 total) in the NFL". does not even appear in the version posted prior to your issuing a block. your actions are mallicious, and aid scurilous attempts to defame this subject. and i have now concluded that this is a prevailing practice on this platform against articles of subjects of specific ethnic backgrounds. i have now come to expect this type of disdain from certain factions of the western communities. even in accademic circles. your actions are defamatory and extremely damaging to wikipedia in general. there will be, as stated before, far reaching ramifications. not to mention that you are going to look very stupid for printing things or creating a perception of subject that only accentuates your minimal scope and ability most likely, scope on certain subject matters. you can now continue propagating you falsehoods without substantive input from the only valid source in this exchange. there are many othe platforms. good luck finding them. stick your own head in the sandbox, and leave there. (talk)

image 9/5/17
Thanks for uploading File:African Sports Star Iheanyi Uwaezuoke as photogenic alias- 'ehani'.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ok you people are just fraudulent. generally. you ask for proof..or a license. then i delete the image and or block it from view and you restore the image that you just initiated protocal to have removed in the first place. you are a fraud sir or ma'am. for your information in some instances source is the equivalent of license...otherwise you yourself would nt hav restored the image. clear validation of malicious and contentious editing you two should be permanently banned from this article. pro football or sports should not be your specialty at all.

last warning image deletion
you are a moron. u sent a warning message requestingimage use permission ..then declared the image  public domain once it was removed. you two are anglers. white collar crimals masking as accademics. there are still laws against defamation and profiling. not to mention people that will outright wup yo ass over your bullshit antics. in the streets. now just to put you bores into you proper place the categories "american football" will be removed from wiki reference lists for the very reasons i gave you. that will be you two's key to stop editing entirely. and stop fuckin with progress just 'cause your not able. bitch. for now your identity is consealed not invisible. be careful. 50.200.200195

Includeonly
What is your intent of adding around categories in an article? Per WP:PARTRANS, it does not seem appropriate. If you are debating that Category:American football return specialists implies the nationality of the player, please discuss this at WT:NFL. The past consensus on use of "American football" and nationalty can be seen at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League/Archive_12. If you want to help improve it, please discuss and get consensus at WT:NFL instead of edit warring. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

r u still a moron? b/c if not, then a very concise version of this article is now available with full edit details. as to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League/Archive_12, the use of the term gridiron football particularly where the subject of the article is not an 'American' indigine or citzen/person/player etc., is far and away the most educated approach for disambiguation. as to the new version of article iheanyi uwaezuoke read the edit details. then post comments if any to talk. the remaining revisions are very minor. the birth date is intentionally omitted as a protective measure for the subject of the article. and as part of the articles' overall storyline pertaining which can be references in the external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.200.200.195 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring, as done at Iheanyi Uwaezuoke. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as done at Iheanyi Uwaezuoke. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.