User talk:50.200.32.6

Independent Scout and Scout-like organizations in the United States
Hello, 50.200.32.6. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Independent Scout and Scout-like organizations in the United States, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Independent Scout and Scout-like organizations in the United States, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. All information in WP articles must be source (or commonly known) in some fashion. Removing a source because it was not fact check by Awana is not a sufficient reason from removing that information. --Spshu (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I just warned you above against editing the Awana at Independent Scout and Scout-like organizations in the United States and you are continuing to do so and pushing your point of view. You need to cease editing the page as they are not to be used to hide the pass practices of the organization. Spshu (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)